When it comes to offering 'best deal' holiday packages to Paris does Eurostar make the grade, or does it have tunnel vision? TheBigRetort discovers... la vérité. The non-stop London to Paris
Eurostar train tickets offer we purchased via the telephone were priced at £204. The 'best deal' we were assured for our short-break by
Eurostar representatives. Guaranteed low prices? We later discovered that the same train journey sold to us was in fact advertised for £50 less. (See
Eurostar retort below.)
In addition, our booking formed part of a 'package' deal, 1 adult and 1 child, (later joined by two additional adults at the
tres agreable Hotel De
L'Ocean in Rue
Mayran, right in the heart of Paris and well worth a weekend. )
So, was it the best deal?
The reservation for our additional guest needed to be changed to one night instead of two. However, the amount returned to the credit card for the cancellation was not the same as the amount paid for the additional night. Who had pocketed the difference?
Eurostar informed us that the difference was a 'penalty' levied by the hotels for the, err, 'amendment'. Which seemed strange... Intrepid travellers to France, where we are known as
Zee Big Red Tart, we had never encountered such a penalty. Neither had we experienced an 'additional' charge for a child residing in the same room. A charge of £23.52 (plus taxes) a night, which again we were informed was levied by the hotels.
In fact the French don't pay or charge such a levy. "No such penalty is charged," they informed us. Adding, "There is no extra guest charge for a 6-year old either," which was intriguing.
A case of less is more with
Eurostar offers surely... So what did
Eurostar have to say? Did it come clean and return our Euros? Or did Euro simply keep them?
When presented with our findings
Eurostar's press office (e-v-e-n-t-u-a-l-l-y) wrote back:
"Due to the complexity of your email I am just checking the final details with various people across the business. I hope to have a comprehensive answer for you within a day or so. Sincere apologies for the delay." Following which... more online delay followed.
But what 'complexity'? What 'fine detail'? And when would we receive that 'comprehensive answer'?
To recap...tickets booked via the telephone through
Eurostar were more expensive than those offered online, the hotel did
not levy charge for reducing a room from two nights to one, and French hotels do not usually charge for a child staying in the same room as adults.
Eurostar does,
blaims the French... and pockets the difference.
At least that's what we decided to put to
Eurostar.... but not without incident.
The question was really a simple one. Based on what
Eurostar claimed, later contradicted by the hotel, either we had highlighted it selling porkies or caught it going down the wrong track. Something
TheBigRetort would have thought that the operator would have been keen to address.
Eurostar has a press office response time infinitely longer than its journey times to Paris... by foot, but press officer Tom Parker had previously informed us that he was eager to 'resolve the matter'. Be that as it may, it was almost as if there were invisible leaves covering the international train operator's muddy tracks. In fact a disembodied voice may have bellowed that there will be either a long delay or a cancellation... and there was
Parker claimed that accommodation, which was booked through
eurostar.com, is actually provided by
WWTE, a subsidiary of
Expedia. It has 'a separate arrangement with the hotel concerned,' he wrote. And as a result
Eurostar 'could not comment'.
Neither could
Eurostar comment on the hotel's cancellation policy, in other words one night reduced to two. (Hotel De
L'Ocean claimed it simply charged for one night with no penalty. )
Neither could it comment on the additional child levy that the hotel also claimed it did not add. And neither did it add up for
Eurostar.
"We will however follow this matter up with
WWTE and ensure that there were no improper charges made in error in this instance," Parker assured. Unfortunately as we did not hear further, we assume that
Eurostar also felt that there were 'no improper charges made in error' - just, dare we say it, a slight of hand worthy of a card shark camped outside Kings Cross Station.
To be fair, Parker claimed that when he checked the online price of a return ticket on the same trains he found 'exactly' the same price. Although his search was conducted after our own, he could not explain the difference 'at this stage'. He never got back to us.
TheBigRetort can only conclude that he could not explain the difference at any stage.
So, thinking of
travelling with
Eurostar on a 'best deal'?
Arrête! Think twice.
.jpg)
