23 October 2023

James O'Brien Ayatollah of the Airwaves: Buy-to-Let controversy lives on


Some years back, we ventured into the realm of James O'Brien, the outspoken LBC radio presenter known for his fearless approach to contentious issues. At the time, O'Brien was fervently condemning buy-to-let property investors, accusing them of inflating rent prices and obstructing the younger generation's path to homeownership. However, our revelation about O'Brien's involvement in the buy-to-let market left many across the nation shocked and bewildered. The Big Retort

Moses on Mortgages

In 2014, LBC’s James O'Brien engaged in a spirited on-air exchange with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, focusing on the Church's land ownership and its impact on tenants. O'Brien's Moses-like critique implied that God had ventured into the realm of demon buy-to-let landlords.

O'Brien's relentless sermon

O'Brien's relentless sermon on buy-to-let painted landlords as the culprits behind housing unaffordability and skyrocketing rental costs. In his view, there were demons lurking within the whole sordid property system. 

St James passionately singled out pensioner investors. Igniting a heated on-air debate, O'Brien ranted: “If we’d have invented this [buy-to-let] system now and tried to sell it to the British public, they’d have chased us out of the country. Yeah… what we’re gonna do… we’re gonna create a system in which people have already got a lot of money; they will 'sort' of buy a house. But they’ll borrow a bunch of cash to buy it! You who have got less than them, you’re gonna pay their mortgage for them. [Smiling inanely in his Podcast] Okay!"

Significantly he added: " Is everybody cool with that - yeah...? Rich bloke here, already got a house. Got a bit of money in the bank! Uses it… uses it to get a - put a - deposit in a flat. You! You’re earning enough to pay a mortgage, but you haven’t got a lump sum to pay the deposit on-- So you’re gonna buy him another house! Is that okay! You’re just gonna buy him a flat...? By living in it and paying for the privilege. (Smiles) Vote me!”

Vote me indeed. First-time buyers were ‘nowhere near being able to afford’ to purchase O’Brien’s former Queen’s Park home - and even if they could, they couldn't - because James held on to it to rent it out.

Begone, Satan!

Our revelation that O'Brien was both an outspoken critic and also a secret player in the buy-to-let market came as a shock to many. Archbishop Welby though seemed unaware of it when he was pushed by O'Brien into defending God's right to rent for profit. It added an intriguing layer to our story. 

While lambasting others for their involvement in buy-to-let, we revealed that O'Brien had retained his former home in Queen's Park as a buy-to-let. All while moving on to pastures new in buttered-parsnips Chiswick - a move often dubbed 'rent-to-buy' in buy-to-let jargon.

Property Investment Details

O'Brien's former property in Queen's Park was prominently advertised for rent at a substantial monthly price. While he claimed to be living there making much-needed improvements to get planning permission. It was eventually sold in 2013, netting him a considerable profit. This then allowed him one year later to sit in front of God’s property managing agent Archbishop Justin Welby and point the moral finger and condemn the rest of the buy-to-let flock too.

The Rachman of the Airwaves

While it might not be entirely fair to compare O'Brien the Prophet from Ampleforth to notorious landlords like *Rachman, he undoubtedly profited from his retention of his then former home - for five and a half years. Given his past experience as a buy-to-let landlord, which he did not confess to the Archbishop Justin Welby, or his listeners, his vocal criticism of buy-to-let investors seemed somewhat dubious. Our report raised questions about the consistency of his stance and whether his critiques might be perceived as hypocritical, given his substantial financial gains from buy-to-let. Our estimates suggested that he may have earned well over a million pounds from his property investment endeavours. It does seem somewhat ironic, doesn't it?

Buy-to-Let on Damascus Road

In light of James O'Brien's history in the buy-to-let market, this story prompts us to re-evaluate the consistency and integrity of some of his viewpoints, surely. While he once profited from buy-to-let, he now vehemently argues against it. A transformation akin to Paul's conversion on the Road to Damascus. It reminds us that, while he can significantly influence public opinions and positions, O’Brien’s personal involvement in buy-to-let also leads him to conveniently forget his own past as a demon landlord. A past from which he profited, hugely. Is everybody cool with that?

[*Perec "Peter" Rachman (16 August 1919 – 29 November 1962) was a Polish-born landlord He operated in Notting Hill, London, England in the 1950s and early 1960s. He became notorious for his exploitation of his tenants, with the word "Rachmanism" entering the Oxford English Dictionary as a synonym for the exploitation and intimidation of tenants.]

Copyright (C) The Big Retort



16 October 2023

The ongoing battle of KJ Building Supplies



In the heart of a thriving Lewisham community, in southeast London, KJ Building Supplies stands as a vital resource for builders and homeowners alike. However, this seemingly unassuming DIY business has found itself at the centre of a complex planning and enforcement dispute with the Council, prompting questions about the boundary between local governance and the law.

The saga began when KJ's was invited to apply for planning approval for an open storage area adjacent to the shop. The request was met with disappointment as planning officer Russell Brown exercised "officer delegated powers" to deny the application. The decision hinged on two key allegations: first, that the land had undergone an unauthorised change of use to a "builder's yard," and second, that a shipping container had been installed without proper permissions.

In response to this setback, KJ’s owners appealed the decision to the planning inspectorate, seeking a reconsideration of the case. Here, the plot thickens. The planning inspector raised concerns about the wording of the allegations and invoked a section of the 1990 Act, allowing corrections if no injustice would result. The inspector's fixation on the grammatical nuances of the allegations, particularly the placement of apostrophes in "builder's yard" from "builders yard," introduced an unexpected diversion.

The dispute centred on whether the land in question belonged to a single builder, multiple builders, or KJ's as a builders' merchant. The misplaced emphasis on grammatical minutiae overshadowed a more critical issue: the categorisation of the land as a "builder's yard" in the first place. KJ's Building Supplies primarily serves as a builders' merchant, specialising in the sale of building materials, with the adjacent land serving as an open storage area.

As the planning appeal was dismissed, enforcement officer Samuel Cadman reignited the enforcement action. By describing the land as a "builder's yard" in a letter delivered on June 6, 2023, Cadman took an unconventional approach, citing the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and stating that owner Kevin Bottomley had "the right to remain silent." This legal development raised questions about the proper role of local councils in advising individuals of their right to remain silent through written communication.

The battle between KJ Building Supplies and Lewisham Council has stirred a groundswell of community support under the banner of "Betterfication, not Gentrification." Over 800 supporters have signed a petition, highlighting the importance of preserving community assets against aggressive planning enforcement.

This ongoing legal saga underscores the challenges businesses like KJ's face when confronted with planning and enforcement actions and raises broader questions about the intersection of local governance and legal procedures. The fight to safeguard KJ's as a community resource continues, and it remains far from over.

Coming soon: The right to remain silent.

Copyright (C) The Big Retort



 

13 October 2023

The Kafkaesque battle of a DIY store in Lewisham


From the beginning, the case of KJ Building Supplies has unfolded in a Kafkaesque manner. It began with a planning contravention notice issued seven years ago. It demanded that local DIY shopkeeper, Kevin Bottomley (pictured), aka “KJ,” cease various activities related to his builders’ merchants. A busy store on the busy A20. 

Kevin had, in fact, sold the shop to his young charge Will Buckle (pictured). However, due to a series of errors and questionable decisions made by planning enforcement officers, Will’s dreams for the future of the store quickly descended into madness. 


Enforcement overreach

Back in June 2016, following a sole complaint, the then enforcement officer Janet Hurst initially determined that the land on which a metal container sat, and which had been introduced that year by Kevin, was not the only thing in breach of planning.

Hurst included the land too, even though it had been used that way for many years. In fact, the description of the breach would notably change over time, with devastating consequences for KJ Building Supplies and for its owners.

The planning application

In 2017, a planning application submitted on behalf of KJ Building Supplies was only actually initiated at the council's invitation. However, this application focused solely on retaining an "existing” metal storage unit to the side of the shop. Then, this seemingly straightforward request took a convoluted path.

Curiously, the completed planning form simply asked to retain the ‘Existing storage unit to the side.’ While the planning officer Russell Brown recorded DC/17/102699 “A retrospective application for the use of the land on the east side… for a builders yard (Sui Generis)…” 

The term "sui generis," Latin for "of its own kind," was introduced to assess whether this unique use of land as a builders’ yard, including a storage container, aligned with existing land use classifications. The officers also claimed that it was in a conservation area, which it wasn’t.

The planning application was refused under delegated powers held by Brown. Since departed from the council. Former head of planning Emma Talbot wrote, “The use of the site as a (sic) open builders' yard with storage container would, by reason of the design and temporary nature of the storage container be unsuitable and inappropriate on a prominent route in the Brockley Conservation Area.”

The land alongside K J Building Supplies wasn’t actually “in” the Conservation Area. It was not even a builders’ yard. Shoppers came. They went.  The end.

(Emma Talbot was somewhat reluctant to present her qualifications to us. She was catapulted through the ranks to the top planning job following the walkout of former head John Miller, who saw through the part-shambolic Lewisham Gateway project. Talbot has since left Lewisham to head up regeneration and development in Harrow, following in the footsteps of her previous Lewisham maternity minder, Viv Evans, who is now chief planning officer… in Harrow.)

COPYRIGHT (C) THE BIG RETORT



04 October 2023

London Yellow Box Junctions: Still a TfL cash cow?


Much of the talk in the media and on the Internet is about the ULEZ expansion. However, let us not forget that other cash cow seemingly out to pasture. Yellow Box Junctions (YBJs) in London have always been a contentious issue for drivers. In the past, these junctions have often been perceived as revenue-generating traps rather than tools for traffic management. While our past discussion initially looked at the tenure of former Mayor Ken Livingstone, the question remains: Are YBJs still a lucrative source of income for Transport for London (TfL)?

A few years back, during the tenure of then London mayor Ken Livingstone, we ran a story on YBJs and the alleged Congestion Charge scam. It sparked outrage among London drivers. Many voiced their concerns. Arguing that these junctions were exploited by TfL to extract fines from unsuspecting motorists, turning them into cash cows rather than serving their intended purpose.

The current landscape

Fast forward to today, and London's transportation scene has evolved into the ULEZ expansion. While YBJs still exist, the focus has shifted somewhat. Under the leadership of the current Mayor Sadiq Khan, there have been notable policy changes, as well as increased scrutiny of TfL's practices.

Policy changes

The most significant change is the increased emphasis on transparency and fairness in all but deeds. The current Mayor has sought to strike a balance between road safety and preventing YBJs from becoming a mere revenue stream. As a result, TfL has introduced measures to ensure that YBJs are primarily used for traffic management purposes.

A call for transparency

The current Mayor's administration seems keen on addressing past controversies. TfL claims it now has a commitment to transparency. This suggests a desire to understand and potentially rectify any issues related to YBJs. But, will it?

While YBJs in London have been a source of contention for years, Sadiq Khan's efforts as mayor  strike a balance between road safety and fair enforcement and are worth noting. The question of whether YBJs remain cash cows or tools for traffic management may not have a definitive answer, but it's clear that the conversation is evolving in a direction that aims to prioritise the interests of London's drivers and visitors. It’s important to scrutinise the impact of YBJs and hold TfL accountable for their management to ensure that London's roadways are both safe and fair for all Londoners and its visitors.


Copyright (c) The Big Retort




02 October 2023

Lewisham Arthouse Open Studios: A glimpse into the creative hub in need of support

 


On Saturday, we had the pleasure of attending the Lewisham Arthouse Open Studios. This vibrant art facility has been a cornerstone of the local creative community for some years now. However, it has recently found itself in dire need of financial support to continue its vital work. TheBigRetort...

The Lewisham Arthouse is much more than just a building; it is a hub for artistic expression, creativity, and cultural and soulful enrichment. The event, which ran from the 31st of September to the 1st of October, showcased the immense talent of local artists while shedding light on the challenges faced by this essential institution. 

Rosey Prince


One of the primary concerns is funding. The future of this important art facility hangs in the balance. It needs substantial financial assistance to maintain its infrastructure and continue its support for local artists. 




As we wandered through the small studios during our visit, it was evident that this place is teeming with artistic energy and potential. However, it was equally evident that the building itself needs some tender loving care.  

Janine Nelson


Despite the challenges, the artists exhibited their works with great passion and enthusiasm. Their dedication to their craft and the Lewisham Arthouse was inspiring to witness. This creative oasis is not just a space for artists to work; it's a community where ideas flourish and collaborations thrive.

Visiting the Lewisham Arthouse is an opportunity to immerse oneself in a world of art, imagination, and innovation. To support this important facility, individuals and organisations are encouraged to dig deep.

Dot Young


The Open Studios event was a testament to the talent and resilience of local artists, even in the face of financial uncertainty. It is our hope that the council and other stakeholders will recognise the vital role that the Arthouse plays in nurturing creativity and culture within the community and will provide the much-needed funding to ensure its continued success.

Art thrives when it has the space and support to flourish, and the Arthouse deserves nothing less.







Reuben Thurnhill, the General Manager of the co-operative, stands as a passionate advocate for both art and funding. His dedication to preserving and enhancing this valuable institution is commendable. We extend our best wishes to him and the entire team at Lewisham Arthouse as they navigate the challenging path towards securing the support they need. 

Reuben Thurnill

LEWISHAM ARTHOUSE

Address: 140 Lewisham Way, London SE14 6PD

Phone: 020 8691 9113

Email: info@lewishamarthouse.org.uk

Copyright (c) TheBigRetort



The Great Iron Mask Hoax revisited


On the 1st January 1908, following a remarkable wager, a man wearing an iron mask set off on an astonishing 30,000 mile journey around the world - then disappeared. TheBigRetort...


Ten years ago we published a story about a great hoax. Even today some people still think it took place. Here, we update it in short form.

The Great Iron Mask Hoax in previous posts detailed the extraordinary saga of 33-year-old Harry Bensley, who accepted a bet made between an American philanthropist and an English nobleman: to push a pram around the world, with his face encased inside an iron mask, for a purse of $100,000.

Many sighting were recorded of "The Mask” at that time but then... he inexplicably vanished.

TheBigRetort: where in the world did The Mask go?

Almost one year after the wager made between Harry Bensley aka The Man in the Iron Mask, a publication known as “Answers” (December 19th, 1908, p63) received a response to this same question; it remained buried… until we unearthed it.

The respondent – who remained anonymous - had a very interesting tale to tell: hence the headline - "The Great Masked Man Hoax”. In response to the "Answers" editor about the disappearance of “Iron Mask” (Bensley), the anonymous writer, claimed he was “The Mask”. It had all been a fabrication, Bensley had been due for release from prison and without any trade to his name he was worried about the future.

Four years previous, Harry Bensley had been sentenced at the Old Bailey in London for a series of bogus claims and deceptions. Also known under the alias “Harry Barker”, the 29-year-old labourer had been collared in South Africa by Scotland Yard. He was convicted of bigamy under the name “Henry Burrell” and had a number of illicit aliases. It was Harry Bensley who became the man in the iron mask.... and the writer of the response to the “Answers” publication. He went on to explain... How I "Faked" the Wager.

His two callings being fraud and deception, Harry Bensley, due for release from his prison cell, began to evolve a scheme of 'considerable profit' – and a mask was its 'chief feature'.  On returning to his cell several library books and magazines had been delivered. One caught his attention: “The Mystery of the Iron Mask.” Popularised by a number of writers down the ages – the original Man in the Iron Mask (it was actually made out of 'black velvet') followed a narrative that was woven out of a factual account of a prisoner in France.

Undergoing a fretful night in the confines of the prison, it was an iron mask that this supposed "anonymous" writer (Harry) saw emerging from the shadows of a prison cell. It was all the inspiration Bensley's fraudster and criminal needed.

Harry wrote: "That night my thoughts kept reverting to the 'Man in the Iron Mask, ‘til, in idle fancy, I began to draw mental pictures of myself passing through life with an iron mask over my face." The hoax was born. 

Harry spent the remaining prison term perfecting his plans. Writing the details 'over and over again' on a prison 'slate'; the terms of the wager; the conditions imposed; two wealthy philanthropists - one of whom he had never actually met, the American banker John Pierpont Morgan, and the other a not totally fabricated English 'nobleman' - were prison cell 'creations'.

Released in November 1907, with a gratuity of 30 shillings - his 'sole worldly possession' - Harry Bensley set about commencing his fraud on the nation. It was a fraud that would last a century. Until unmasked in The Big Retort.

Harry purchased a large map of the British Isles 'and other trifles'. At Clarkson's, a well-known costumiers. Harry inspected several masks of various origins. The one he wanted, a knight's helmet, was priced at more than he could afford and so he left it 'for the time'. Just hours out of prison, taking the train out to the country where his 'wife' was living, he made known the terms of the 'wager'.

Gossip 'soon bruited'. One neighbour agreed to provide the perambulator - 'for a future consideration' - and so became an unwitting accomplice in the century-long deception. He would not be alone...

Harry did not name the 'nobleman' who assisted in creating the hoax. He was apparently, "German - a man of superior education, and evidently of some social standing," and they had done time together. It was to this ex con that Harry confided the truth. "To my surprise he offered to finance me, adding also his willingness to help me in any other way besides."

Unfortunately the German wanted a 'backhander' from time to time. 'A heavy tax on my takings' Harry later wrote. Nevertheless, Harry finally went home with the twenty-five-shilling iron mask and a moderate supply of pamphlets and postcards advertising 'the wager'. The mask and pram were also inscribed with the details. 

Harry was pictured standing boldly wearing the iron mask with the pram and his young aide alongside. The latter an additional expense for which Harry had a ruse, a dodge ‘as ancient as Adam'. By way of security Harry Bensley set about deceiving gullible young men who would assist in the Wager. These unsuspecting 'teenagers' - for a £5 fee - were offered a third of the eventual prize money: if they completed the terms of the Wager. Since Harry never intended completing such a trek, there would be no obligation to pay. On the other hand if this boy left Harry's service within six months of engagement, he would forfeit the fiver. A win-win for Harry.


Old Iron Mask also had to get married 'on the road somewhere' – without removing the mask. This did not stop Harry. "I already had a wife," he admitted. Harry had in fact been married in 1898. A bigamous marriage followed that would see him sent to prison. It was this 'new wife' that done for Harry and it was she who secretly joined him at safe houses along the route of the wager.


The walking wager begins

It was the morning of the Wager. In London it was 'very foggy'. Harry had driven to the station in a taxi with his 'minder'. They had boarded the Charing Cross train without any attention. However, it was the decorated perambulator that attracted an 'eagle-eyed' stationmaster who asked the man in the iron mask if he had a ticket for it.

Finally, it was only when the 'Mask' was halfway across the platform that Harry found himself in the midst of an excited mob. "For a moment I felt horribly nervous.”

However, instead of making a dash aboard his connecting train, Harry started selling his newly-minted postcards: "for all I was worth.” (The postcards listing the fictitious wager can still be found in second-hand shops or on eBay.)

Newspapers later reported that at approximately 10am a train which was carrying a man wearing an iron mask pulled into Charing Cross Station. A representative from the Daily Mirror photographed the man in the iron mask and his young minder. The walk 'through the world' had commenced.

Flanked by enormous cheering crowds - Londoners literally threw money at masked Harry. Down the Strand, on to Cheapside, over London Bridge, on towards Woolwich... by the time they stopped it was 9.30pm. Exhausted, they had not eaten since breakfast. They were very hungry.

Later, the Man in the Iron Mask, an ex-con, made an untimely appearance at Dartford Court. He stood charged with peddling postcards without a licence. But when his lawyer explained the conditions of the bet - following hearty deliberations - the chairman of the court allowed the defendant, who then offered the alias “Henry Mason”, to remain masked. 


This was a first in British criminal law. Had the chairman ordered its removal the legend of the masked wager would have died at Dartford. Instead - “We are not anxious to know the (his real) name,” said the court chairman.


The end is nigh

It had been ten long months since Harry Bensley commenced the iron mask deception. He had still not left English shores. Of course people were starting to ask questions. They could not remain gullible for so long, could they?

In truth, if ever there was one for a man like Harry, A pram full of postcards. A punishing daily routine. A heavy metal helmet. Harry was tired of being welcomed by lord mayors and a gullible admiring public. The deception was closing like a metal vice around Harrys head - literally. The fabricated wager had now become Harry's Pentonville.

Mobbed by crowds. In the sometimes excessive heat or cold of England. Having to sit through boring speech after boring speech by whatever dignitary was throwing dinner. Harry could not eat or drink himself due to the helmet. The fictitious wager, sown out of a prison cell, had turned into a heavy burden for its creator. The iron mask had become the shackles that Harry the deceiver bore for this his greatest swindle.

Finally, after covering a distance of what he claimed was some 2,400 miles, on these shores only, the prisoner in the iron mask threw 'up' the sponge. "My eyes ached, and I suffered with racking pains in my head," Harry opined. It was at Wolverhampton that Iron Mask was finally no more. He disappears from newspaper accounts about this time. Weeks later, Harry wrote in to the publication "Answers” (remaining anonymous of course): "In conclusion, I can assert without fear of contradiction that I have paid my way, and supported myself, my wife, and my assistant, and the horses and attendants I employed, entirely from the sale of my cards and pamphlets, and I have received nothing in the shape of charity from the first day of my itinerary."

Nothing but deception

Harry Bensley never did make it around the world. He had never intended to leave these shores; not really. Neither was he ever arrested for this his great deception. Could this be why the Great Masked Man Hoax remains unknown - even today? Or is there something else at play in the human psyche that causes fraudsters like Harry to seize upon it? In the words of one writer, who was referring to the original famous prisoner in the black velvet mask: “If there is found in the history of a people a single point which is not quite clear, Dame Legend immediately takes a hand and furnishes an unending supply of material, from which coming generations manufacture romances which in most cases outlive and conquer the true stories. And there is probably no other case within the last thousand years which proves this adage as well as that of the 'Man in the Iron Mask'.”

Perhaps myths and legends are best left unchallenged.

Harry Bensley died in 1956. His postcards still bear witness to the faded memory of a con in rust-covered iron. And it is on this which the legend of the Mask sits.

[Please use (in part) with accreditation. For further see Answers to Correspondents on Every Subject under the sun. Title later shortened to “Answers”. The Great Masked Man Hoax, December 19th, 1908, p63. British Library Reading Rooms.]

[Since writing about the above we have made some interesting contacts. Jim Westergard. Jim, a Canadian, has a quite unique series of drawings and wood engravings; one which features ‘Iron Mask’ (reproduced above, and with his kind permission) and other fascinating characters. Andrew Grumbridge for a song dedication. We are also grateful to the curiously titled “Dark Roasted Blend (Weird & Wonderful Things)” for its constant stream of visitors. DRB was created by Avi Abrams, also a Canadian, in 2005, and boasts around 1 million visitors per month.]

                                                   

COPYRIGHT (C) THE BIG RETORT

Lewisham Council's DIY planning enforcement

 

 

SAVE KJ  BUILDING SUPPLIES 

Nestled alongside a small parade of shops on the Lewisham run of the A20, in the heart of a community, sits a small DIY merchant with a builders' yard. The original store opened back in the early '80s, its founder believing if you build it, they will come. “They” did... in the form of council     enforcement officers. TheBigRetort…

Early doors and heritage windows

“KJ, Building Supplies” received its initials from Kevin Bottomley, 71, since retired. In what was supposed to be a steady transition from one hard working generation to the next, young charge Will Buckle took over the business.  A good  move for Will. Since the arrival of the Orange Line to Brockley, many residents went on a building spree improving the buildings into upmarket flats and houses. The materials, along with friendly advice, being supplied over the years have proved to be a  community bonus. A genuine public-good. Something Lewisham Council may not have realised when it served an enforcement notice in June 2016. A controversial move that saw the shop suddenly threatened with closure.  It read: "Unauthorised siting of a container on land adjacent to 55 Loampit Hill together with the use of the land for storage or building materials." (Planning enforcement officer, Janet Hurst.)

For decades, KJ’s has been a reliable source of construction materials, tools, and expert advice. The container, placed there in 2016, stored wood. It was set quite a way back from the main highway so the problem could not be best understood. Also, the land itself had always been in use for some type of storage, bags of sand and cement, as far back as residents and customers could remember. Kevin initially started down the hill but had placed a planning application for the second property back in 1983, for a builders' merchant.

 But recent gentrification efforts in the area, promoted by the council and heritage society, have raised concerns about the treatment of the builders’ merchant. .Some years back, KJ had been invited to apply for planning permission for a metal storage container placed some distance back from the highway at the side of the building. Surprisingly, planning permission was refused.  

The refusal letter

The council’s refusal letter stated: “The use of the site as an open builders' yard with a storage container would, by reason of the design and temporary nature of the storage container, be unsuitable and inappropriate on a prominent route in the Brockley Conservation Area and would have a significantly harmful impact on its special character and visual amenity of the locality…”

The prominent route in the conservation area is the A20

 “Urban design,” “Local character,” “Changes of use and alterations affecting designated heritage assets and their setting,” even the “schedule of ancient monuments and registered parks and gardens” were listed. Conservation areas and heritage assets and the historic environment amongst other matters became the tools to beat KJ Building Supplies.  Leaving one to wonder who had it in for DIY.

The nail in the coffin

The planning enforcement notice cited the Brockley Conservation Area. Designated to protect its special architectural and historic interests, this often entails stricter rules for any development or changes “within” it. Planners typically pay close attention to factors like the design, appearance, and materials used in any proposed development. Even minor alterations or new constructions, like a builders' yard or storage container, may face more scrutiny and require a higher standard of design and appropriateness.  

We probed the conservation area list of streets. Loampit Hill is not recorded.  It is  part of the very busy A20 leading into and out of London. 

This error could have substantial consequences for KJ. Without the use of the land and container, the business will be forced to shut. But, since the original officers who may have brought the case have left the council, who is to rectify any potential mistakes? 

Regardless, how could enforcement have been considered, given that the yard has always been used for storage of some sort? 

Curiously, when the same planning officer made a Request for Enforcement Action against another property in 2012 at 21 Loampit Hill, it was noted: "The premises is not within a conservation area, or subject to an Article 4 Direction, nor is it within the vicinity of any listed building." The request for enforcement also stated:  "... whether it is expedient for the Council to instigate formal enforcement action." Circular 10/97: Enforcing Planning Control: legislative provisions and procedural requirements (2006)were applied.

The property was just a short stroll down the hill from KJ Building Supplies. No such undertaking to the council was made for KJ. However, the yard appears to have been mistakenly placed inside the conservation area. Rather than alongside it. This probably triggered the more rigorous planning tests and made it more challenging to gain approval for KJ Building Supplies continued use. Leading to the enforcement issues described. However, the core of the matter lies in an assumption made by a previous planning officers, who have since left the council, and who placed the builders’ yard squarely inside the conservation area. But the land enforced against is NOT inside it. As this picture shows.  


COPYRIGHT (C) THE BIG RETORT



30 September 2023

The fishmonger of Deptford: Bob "The Fish" Cummings

 

Amid the bustle of Deptford Market, where myriad languages from diverse ethnic groups fill the air, a legend stands with a name that commands the utmost respect – Bob "The Fish" . Welcome to the world of Bob, where fish reign supreme. And he remains the undisputed king of fish. TheBigRetort

 

The Rise of Bob Fish

Bob "The Fish" Cummings is a character whose presence leaves an indelible mark. Much like the iconic mafia patriarchs of cinematic fame. "Don" Cummings' journey began decades ago. It's a fishy tale rich with stories told and untold. 

Bob's path to local fame commenced at the now-shuttered fishmonger's, formerly located at 47 & 49 Deptford High Street. Unperturbed by the shop's closure, Bob embarked on a new venture, setting up his stall in the heart of the bustling market on the High Street. Just turn right onto the Hgh Street when you have exited the station.

To listen to Bob recount his daily escapades forms a ceaseless banter that could rival any stand-up comedian. As he regales customers with tales of rising before the break of dawn to secure the freshest catches, his seemingly stern countenance hides a treasure trove of jokes.

"Bob isn't just a stand-up guy; he's a stand-up comedian, a true character who keeps everyone entertained."

Our editor seldom escapes Bob's sharp wit, with his trademark question, "She let you out today, 'as she!?" The "she" in question stands right beside him, ready to give Bob as good as she gets. However, engaging in a quick-draw banter contest with Bob Cummings is an exercise in futility. His wit is usually sharper than his trusty fish knife.

 

The Cummings Clan

Behind the fish... the formidable Cummings clan. A family perhaps not as notorious as any dynasty, but distinguished nonetheless by a south London banter that reflects their deep-rooted camaraderie and devotion to their patriarch. 

While comparisons to cinematic legends are enticing, Bob's story is unique. It's firmly rooted in the fabric of Deptford Market. Where the Cummings' family's indomitable spirit remains a constant. Although the future of the fish-selling empire may be uncertain, "Don" Bob, surrounded by his sons and grandsons, makes offers that many customers simply "don't refuse." 

Yet, it appears that Bob's aspirations for fishy business do not extend to the younger generation. He has already trained his grandsons, but much like Don Corleone's reluctance regarding his son Michael, Bob's sons' balk at the thought of his grandkids becoming entangled in the world of fish. 

In the lively market, there are bound to be Cummings and goings. One grandson has become a chef, while the other is on a five-year journey toward becoming a surgeon, albeit with some reservations about filleting fish. Grandson Alfie worked with Bob then joined the Royal Engineers. He's now studying military geospatial engineering and working towards a batchelor of science.

Deptford Market may not be where the river meets the High Street, but a sea of people consistently find their way to Bob's stall. They come not only for the prices but also for the unbeatable family spirit that permeates every transaction.

In the world of fish, Bob reigns supreme. 

And may he cease to "sleep with the fishes" for many years to come. 

 


 

 Copyright © The Big Retort


 

The "support facade": a lizard enigma?

Leaks over Lewisham In today's digital age, seeking assistance from companies and local authorities following complaints or issues has...