19 June 2007
FINES SCAM CHALLENGE
The Morgan -v- Transport for London appeal took place today at PATAS (the Parking And Traffic Appeals Service). In a surprise move, adjudicator Andrew Harman dispensed with previous TfL 'evidence', and decided to consider video footage instead - made available by the Authority only after the fine was disputed. (See earlier post Lewisham Scam-Cam below.)
But why should the adjudicator choose to decide the merits of the case on the video footage alone? Is it because the photograph TfL presented of the vehicle 'stopped' on the junction box was in fact a snap of a car moving?
The adjudicator claims he does not need to consider the still photograph - in effect evidence of wrongdoing or cock up by TfL - because video footage alone is (now) 'enough' evidence. But the video footage was not what TfL supplied in support of its case against me.... Despite this, the PATAS adjudicator was unable to reach his deliberations at the Hearing, and instead claimed that he needed to view the video footage again - even though he had done so twice that day in my presence.
But let's not lose sight of the regulations in this matter. [7] [1] "no such person shall cause a vehicle to enter the box junction so that the vehicle has to stop within the box junction due to the presence of stationary vehicles". [Emphasis added.]
The video reveals that there were no stationary vehicles when my vehicle entered the box. It appears, however, that this may be open to further 'interpretation' by TfL. According to the PATAS adjudicator TfL may (and does) say... 'You should not enter the box if anything (whatsoever) causes you to stop within it.'
Asked how PATAS adjudicators maintain an impartial position - given that the organisation shares an office suite with the ALG Transport & Environment Committee - Harman claimed that this would not affect his decision making.
The Parking and Traffic Appeals Service (PATAS) claims that it "aims to provide a fast, efficient and quality service....[through] panels of independent adjudicators." Coincidentally, it considers appeals against Penalty Charge Notices issued by ALG (now known as "London Councils")whilst also coincidentally being on its payroll...
[Ed's note.. The organisation shares more than an acronym with the Patas Monkey photographed above. Erythrocebus patas is ground-dwelling, should normally avoid dense forests... and, like its namesake PATAS, junction boxes.]
Labels:
TfL
A devotion to forensic investigative journalism that has led to the exploration of a diverse range of subjects; exposing hidden truths and shedding light on crucial matters. These include…
BBC TV Documentary: "Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack – The Colour of Justice" – A deep dive into the racial dynamics of a nation.
Spotlight on Financial Institutions: Channel 4 News Exclusive Exposé on Banking Practices
Punch Magazine: "Unearthing the Scandal of the High Street Banks," "Open Secrets of the Queen’s Bank," "Zeno – Unravelling a 30-Year-Old Literary Mystery"
Personal Encounters: "Navigating the Crossfire – Insights from working with Michael Winner" pseudo film director and food critic,
Prominent Pre-features that saw the Rise of The Big Retort: The Times, The Telegraph, The Express, The Guardian, Sunday Business et al.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
The Ayatollah of the Airwaves, James O’Brien, is still raging at the radio ether. His current demons: pensioner investors a...
-
A Texan aged 63 has won at scratch-off card games every two years since 2006. In 1993 she also won a lottery bringing her total winnings to ...
-
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who is he? It has been claimed that Dominique Strauss-Kahn (note the hyphenated surname) is the well-to-do son of G...
A Lingering Debt: The UK's final settlement of slave trade compensation
In 1833, the British Empire abolished slavery, a landmark decision that marked the end of a cruel and inhumane practice. However, the legacy...
No comments:
Post a Comment